From 32ff8fcf58f950d4e5ce615a0fc4af33d65f9713 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Roitzsch Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 16:03:52 +0000 Subject: running both is best, because "make distcheck" can still miss files (when they are not needed on your architecture, but only on someone else's) CVS patchset: 6966 CVS date: 2004/09/12 16:03:52 --- doc/internal/HOWTO.release | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'doc') diff --git a/doc/internal/HOWTO.release b/doc/internal/HOWTO.release index 46d97215d..3827b2dba 100644 --- a/doc/internal/HOWTO.release +++ b/doc/internal/HOWTO.release @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ Currently, best practice to get a release out looks like this: - you might want to run "make release-check", it will tell you about files from CVS missing in the release; be sure to check these - OR + AND you might want to run "make distcheck", this will test the packaging, building, and testing of all xine-lib. This will -- cgit v1.2.3