Bug #25
openLicence issues
Description
Please update the GPL license text (wrong FSF address) and add a small license header to each source file (see the paragraph "How to apply these terms..." in the GPL) or at least add a license disclaimer as proposed by the GPL to the README.
Just stating "see the file COPYING" is not enough. It should be clear, which GPL versions can be applied. GPL 2 only can be problematic if VDR gets ever released under GPL 3, so I suggest GPL2 or any later.
Updated by monty35 over 15 years ago
- Status changed from New to Assigned
- % Done changed from 0 to 10
COPYING updated
Updated by monty35 over 15 years ago
monty35 wrote:
COPYING updated, Wikipage updated, will contact authors regarding change of license to "GPLv2 or any later"
Updated by monty35 over 15 years ago
- Due date set to 01/03/2009
- Estimated time set to 1:00 h
Updated by monty35 over 15 years ago
- Target version changed from 0.4.0 to 0.5.0
Did not receive any feedback until now from former authors.
Updated by monty35 over 15 years ago
- Status changed from Assigned to Resolved
- Target version changed from 0.5.0 to 0.4.0
Version 0.4.0 released
Updated by monty35 over 15 years ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Feedback
- Target version changed from 0.4.0 to 0.5.0
- % Done changed from 10 to 50
License text fixed, switch to "GPLv2 or any" later is still pending until feedback of former authors.