Correct buffer size calculations in cx88-core.c

From: Duncan Sands <duncan.sands@math.u-psud.fr>

The computation in cx88_risc_buffer suffers from the mistake:
a non-zero padding value can cause more page borders to be crossed,
leading to big buffer over-runs.  
This patch changes the additive constant from 3 + 4 to 4
It also changees the constant in cx88_risc_databuffer from 3 + 4 to 2,
because 2 dwords are the correct vaule.

Signed-off-by: Duncan Sands <baldrick@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions