Project

General

Profile

Actions
Copy link

Bug #546

closed

patch to use the right svdrpport 6419, up from vdr-1.7.15

Added by Anonymous almost 14 years ago. Updated almost 14 years ago.

Status:
Rejected
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Joe_D
Target version:
0.1.0
Start date:
02/04/2011
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:

Description

I don't get an OSDmessage with vdr-1.7.16

attached diff is a possible fix to use the right svdrpport, up from vdr-1.7.15

Cheers

(realname on top in the .diff)

Files

vdr-markad-0.0.8_svdrpport.diff (1.63 KB) vdr-markad-0.0.8_svdrpport.diff Anonymous, 02/04/2011 06:34 PM
Actions
Copy link
 #1

Updated by Joe_D almost 14 years ago

  • Assignee set to Joe_D
  • % Done changed from 0 to 80

Why don't you just add an entry into your services file (svdrp/tcp)?

Actions
Copy link
 #2

Updated by Joe_D almost 14 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Rejected

No answer till now -> Rejected

Actions
Copy link
 #3

Updated by hd_brummy almost 14 years ago

services file?
where is the information for this?
how is the syntax of this?

anyway,

Port 2001 and Port 6419 are the default ports used by VDR
this to handle or to fix on install should not be at least by the user himself
only in the case he will not use the default ports, he should change it by himself in the "services file???"

make it more clear for the user how is it to handle
and/or better,
make it more comfortable with this fix...

Actions
Copy link
 #4

Updated by Joe_D almost 14 years ago

  • Target version changed from 0.0.9 to 0.1.0
  • % Done changed from 80 to 100

"services file?
where is the information for this?
how is the syntax of this?"

svdrp is now an "official" service on port 6419 and you should have an entry in /etc/services like this:

svdrp 6419/tcp # VDR

"make it more clear for the user how is it to handle
and/or better,
make it more comfortable with this fix..."

Sorry for this. Your patch it binding markad standalone-version to the VDR sources, and i dont want this.

I'll add the above into the README, ok?

Actions
Copy link
 #5

Updated by hd_brummy almost 14 years ago

Sorry for this. Your patch it binding markad standalone-version to the VDR sources, and i dont want this.

I understand, this is the reason ...

I'll add the above into the README, ok?

you can do this at first,
anyway, i think in the future the registred svdrp service will added per default in the /etc/services on the diffrent Distris,...

thanks for your time and work for now :)

Actions
Copy link

Also available in: Atom PDF